Abstract
This study examines how community participation shapes urban renewal outcomes. Evidence suggests that early and meaningful participation improves public acceptance and strengthens long-term trust (Zhang et al., 2024). Collaborative governance also improves implementation by connecting resident knowledge with professional planning (Li & Chen, 2023).
Using survey data from 26 renewal projects, the analysis identifies trust, information transparency, and perceived procedural fairness as key mediators. Digital participation tools broaden access, while facilitated offline workshops remain essential for resolving disagreement and including residents with lower digital literacy (Chen & Huang, 2024).
References
Zhang, M., Wang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Community participation and urban renewal performance: Collaborative governance and procedural fairness. Urban Studies, 61(4), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098024123186
Li, Q., & Chen, X. (2023). Collaborative governance in existing communities: Organizational networks, trust, and implementation. Cities, 138, 104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104321
Wu, R., Zhao, J., & Sun, Y. (2022). Trust formation in public participation: Transparency, deliberation quality, and government response. Journal of Public Management, 19(3), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.2022.03.004
Chen, Y., & Huang, L. (2024). Digital platforms and neighborhood co-design: Affordances and inclusive governance. Cities, 149, 104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104912